One of the life’s simple pleasures for
me is that once a week or so, on my daily slog out to the mailbox, I find nestled in with the notices of plunging investment, various fare increases, and
other epistolary bad news, my print edition of the Onion
.
It blends unassumingly with it's more pernicious brethren, seemingly innocuous and all folded in on itself so as not to
offend the post person or spoil the shock of the headline. I avoid reading it online because I
have it delivered and I don’t open it when I initially retrieve it from the box
because I wouldn’t trade that moment of plopping down on the hopper or climbing
into bed and finally opening it up for anything. Or not many things at least. One has to be careful at the initial
unveiling as an uncontrolled guffaw or other release of air is likely to occur,
and depending at what stage of ablutions one is enjoying or who else is in the
immediate vicinity, this can lead to pulled muscles, nosebleeds, and other
strains on the system. The sheer privilege of folding a publication open on a weekly basis
however to find a headline along the lines of “Enormous Bra Found
” or “F$*k Everything, we’re doing
five blades!
–
Gillette CEO” is a quality of life enhancer well worth the fifty or so dollars a year it costs for home
subscription.
Much of the genius of the Onion of
course is that, often, if you weren’t reading it right out of the paper itself but had bumped across a story online somewhere,
it wouldn’t be entirely clear as to whether it was satire or real news. And
even if one is aware that it’s satire from the get go, the writing is often more spot on than
the stories on the same topics in traditional papers. I was browsing through an old edition this morning
when I noticed a story I’d missed the first time entitled Gay-Pride Parade Sets
Mainstream Acceptance Of Gays Back 50 Years.
The second paragraph…
"I'd always thought gays were
regular people, just like you and me, and that the stereotype of homosexuals as
hedonistic, sex-crazed deviants was just a destructive myth," said mother
of four Hannah Jarrett, 41, mortified at the sight of 17 tanned and oiled boys
cavorting in jock straps to a throbbing techno beat on a float shaped like an enormous
phallus. "Boy, oh, boy, was I wrong."
It continues….
”Among the parade sights and sounds
that did inestimable harm to the gay-rights cause: a group of obese women in
leather biker outfits passing out clitoris-shaped lollipops to horrified
onlookers; a man in military uniform leading a submissive masochist, clad in
diapers and a baby bonnet, around on a dog leash; several Hispanic dancers in
rainbow wigs and miniskirts performing "humping" motions on a
mannequin dressed as the Pope; and a dozen gyrating drag queens in see-through
dresses holding penis-shaped beer bottles that appeared to spurt
ejaculation-like foam when shaken and poured onto passersby.”
Bleeding hilarious! And like most good humor it is
so because the tale told is close enough to the truth to be plausible and, in this case, is written in a
straight forward journalistic style that makes it seem like it could be
completely legit. The fact that the Onion angle is often likely closer to
reality than the mainstream coverage of the same event just drives the hilarity
home. Every now and then of course, an Onion story gets mistaken by some
foreign dignitary as depicting the truth and it’s easy to see why. I don’t
remember the exact details but I recall the Chinese government releasing some
form of statement when they were amazed to learn that we Americans had moved
the whole white house to Tennessee. Their information was based on an Onion story. What is also funny
is when a story comes across the wires which one assumes immediately can only
be from the Onion until it turns out to be from a paper not purposefully marketing humor.
Example below:
WATERBURY, Vt.
—Mooove
over, Holsteins. PETA wants world-famous Ben & Jerry's Homemade Ice Cream
to tap nursing moms, rather than cows, for the milk used in its ice cream.
People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals is asking the ice cream maker to begin using breast milk in its
products instead of cow's milk, saying it would reduce the suffering of cows
and calves and give ice cream lovers a healthier product.
The idea got a cool reception
Thursday from Ben & Jerry's officials, the company's customers and even La
Leche League International, the world's oldest breast-feeding support
organization, which promotes the practice -- for babies, anyway.
"We applaud PETA's novel
approach to bringing attention to an issue, but we believe a mother's milk is
best used for her child," spokesman Sean Greenwood said in an e-mail. He
didn't respond to requests for an interview.
"It's kind of creepy," said
Jeff Waugh, 42, of Dayton, Ohio.
"I think it's a little
nutty," said the Rev. Roger Wooton, 83, of Malden, Mass., finishing up a
cup of Heath Bar Crunch.
"How would they get all that
milk?" said his wife, Jane Wooton, 77.
Jen Wahlbrink, 34, of Phoenix, who
breast-fed her 11-month-old son, Cameron, said she wouldn't touch ice cream
made from mother's milk. She remembers her nursing days -- and not that fondly.
"The (breast) pumps just weren't
that much fun. You really do feel like a cow," she said, cradling her son
in her hands.
I have a friend involved loosely with La Leche League and even she was shocked by this article. And I'm sure that more than a few people assumed that America's Finest News Source was behind it.
Recent Comments